First of all, determine which party's responsibility and discuss compensation issues
Natural disasters and human disasters are one thing that no one can avoid. Of course, the owner does not want his dog to have an accident. But no one will be sure about anyone, so there will be so many accidents. Traffic accidents are also one of the common accidents of dogs, and they have a certain impact on the dog's body and psychology. Therefore, in addition to asking for medical losses, some owners will also ask for compensation for the dog's mental loss. So is it reasonable for such a gift?
It is also a very common problem that dogs are hit in our usual life. The compensation processing after the accident is often the main reason for the dispute. Of course, the issue of compensation must be made. One party does not wear a traction rope for the dog, then the owner should be fully responsible. However, if the driver is illegal online and a dog has a dog wearing a traction rope and abides by the traffic rules, the driver should be responsible for full responsibility. Since accidents have occurred, medical compensation must be inevitable, but in addition to proposing medical compensation, some owners will also ask for compensation for mental loss, and the cost is much higher than the medical expenses. Is this request reasonable?
Generally, the court trial believes that the cost of medical expenses for the treatment of pet dogs and actual expenses should be supported; however, it is similar to the fact that the income is not provided to prove that the income of the treatment of pet dogs has actually reduced income, so this item is for this item. Therefore, this item is for this item. The complaint is not supported; as for the so -called mental damage, we rarely provide relevant evidence support, so we are generally not supported.
In some cases, you can ask for compensation for mental loss fees
Regarding the demands of mental damage compensation, whether it should be controversial in judicial practice. The compensation for mental damage under the current legal system in my country is mainly applicable to the situation where personal rights are damaged. For the owner's "property", we generally do not support the amount of mental damage compensation. Of course, not the pet dogs are harmed in all cases, and the owner cannot claim compensation for mental damage. When pet dogs have a symbolic significance for the owner, the requirements for mental damage compensation should be supported, such as pet dogs and guide dogs of lonely old people. In the judicial practice, such behaviors are characterized by infringement of such acts as infringement of the owner's property rights and other personality interests, supporting the demands of their mental damage compensation, and reflecting the concept of the law that the law should progress with changes in social life.
It is not difficult to know that not all situations can ask for a dog for mental loss for all circumstances. Generally, only dogs have a very special significance to ourselves. For example, dogs are their only spiritual pillars, or rely on, and so on. However, instead of considering how to get compensation, we might as well think about how to avoid damage to dogs. After all, it is impossible to be so lucky for every dog. After the accident, it can still keep his life. If the dog is killed by accident, it is difficult to make up for the spiritual damage. Therefore, you must pay attention to the safety of the dog when you go out.